 |
||
|
Advanced Search |
||
|
|||||
|
Criticality Analysis < Verification & Validation < Results Home
|
|
Click here to complete a short survey. The results of this survey will be used to help us improve the research program and this website.
Click here to view research projects that had new research results added in the last 90 days.
|
| Optimizing IV&V Benefits Using Simulation | |
| Point of Contact |
David Raffo Davidr@sba.pdx.edu |
| Dates | October 2002 - February 2008 |
| Problem |
How can the economic benefit of IV&V technologies be optimized? What is the best strategy for applying IV&V technologies? What is the benefit if a given IV&V technique is applied at different insertion points in the development process or applied multiple times? What is the benefit of applying one combination of IV&V techniques to a given process vs another? Would there be an economic benefit to contracting V&V activities out as IV&V instead? |
| Objective |
The benefit associated with IV&V techniques depends on how the techniques are applied (i.e. where in the process they are applied, how often they are applied and so forth). The proposed Software Process Simulation Models (SPSMs) will capture the necessary details of software development and IV&V processes enabling NASA to address the questions stated above. |
| Results |
SAS 06 Executive Presentation.ppt SAS 06 Technical Presentation.ppt Workflow Model of One IV&V Technique.pdf SAS 05 Executive Presentation.ppt SAS 05 Technical Presentation.pdf Business Case Analysis using IEEE-12207 model.pdf Screen shot of the management interface screen.pdf Screen shot showing SILAP policy implemented in IEEE 12207 model.pdf Screen shot showing file loading interface.pdf |
| Keywords | software development, mission critical, quality assurance, lifecycle |
| Categories |
Quality Assurance Software Safety Criticality Analysis Management & Planning of V&V Process Improvement |
|
| |
|
Curator: Josh Stonestreet NASA Official: Lisa Montgomery |
|
NASA Privacy, Security, Notices |