|
|||||
|
Quality Engineering < Software Quality < Results Home
|
|
Click here to complete a short survey. The results of this survey will be used to help us improve the research program and this website.
Click here to view research projects that had new research results added in the last 90 days.
|
| Optimizing IV&V for Mature Organizations | |
| Point of Contact |
Christopher Fuhrman christopher.fuhrman@etsmtl.ca |
| Dates | August 2002 - July 2003 |
| Problem | NASA is intending for its future software development agencies to have at least a Level 3 rating in the Carnegie Mellon University Capability Maturity Model (CMM) [1]. The CMM has built-in Verification and Validation (V&V) processes that support higher software quality. Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) of software developed by mature agencies can be therefore more effective than for software developed by less mature organizations. How is Independent V&V different with respect to the maturity of an organization? Knowing a priori the maturity of an organization's processes, how can IV&V planners better identify areas of need, choose IV&V activities, etc? |
| Objective | The objective of this research is to provide a complementary set of guidelines and criteria to assist the planning of IV&V activities on a project using a priori knowledge of the measurable levels of maturity of the organization developing the software. |
| Results |
Analysis of CMM KPA's from IV&V Perspective.zip |
| Keywords | CMM, maturity, software development, CARA, mission-critical software |
| Categories |
Quality Assurance Quality Control Quality Engineering Management & Planning of V&V |
|
| |
|
Curator: Josh Stonestreet NASA Official: Lisa Montgomery |
|
NASA Privacy, Security, Notices |